Se afișează postările cu eticheta Percutaneous. Afișați toate postările
Se afișează postările cu eticheta Percutaneous. Afișați toate postările

vineri, 9 decembrie 2011

9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
According to a study published Online First by the Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, an examination of the outcomes of over 15,000 individuals who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; balloon angioplasty or stent placement procedures to open narrow coronary arteries) revealed that almost 1 in 10 individuals were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Furthermore, these patients also had an increased risk of death within one year. Several factors were connected with hospital readmission, including Medicare insurance, female sex, unstable angina and others.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day readmission rates have become a quality performance measure, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports hospital-level, 30-day, risk-standardized readmission rates for patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; heart attack), and for patients undergoing PCI. However, little is known regarding the factors associated with 30-day readmission after PCI."

Farhan J. Khawaja, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., and colleagues carried out an investigation in order to detect factors connected with 30-day readmission rates as well as the reason for the readmission and the connection of 30-day readmission with one-year mortality rates for individuals after PCI. The team identified 15,498 PCI hospitalizations (elective or for acute coronary syndromes) between January 1998 and June 2008. A range of models were used in order to estimate the adjusted connection between clinical, demographic, and procedural variable as well as 30-day readmission and one-year mortality.

The team found that overall, 9.4% (1,459) patients who had undergone PCI procedures were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Out of the 1,459 patients readmitted 1,003 (69%) were readmission due to cardiac-related reasons. Within 30 days there were 106 deaths (0.68%), including 73 deaths not linked to a readmission and 33 deaths that occurred during or after readmission.

The researchers state:

"After multivariate analysis, demographic factors associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission for PCI included female sex, Medicare insurance, and less than a high school education. The clinical and procedural factors associated with an increased risk of readmission include CHF at presentation, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, moderate to severe renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease, metastatic cancer, and a length of stay of more than three days."

After the researchers adjusted for various factors they discovered that individuals who were readmitted within 30 days had a higher death rate at one year compared to individuals who were not readmitted.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day risk-standardized readmission rates after PCI have become a publicly reported performance measure, and there is high interest from hospitals and clinicians to understand and improve modifiable factors associated with 30-day readmission rates.

Lack of early follow-up has been associated with increased risk of readmission among patients with heart failure and may also be playing a role in patients undergoing PCI. Early follow-up allows patients and clinicians to ensure understanding and compliance, and to gauge the effectiveness of therapies.

The educational component of follow-up cannot be underestimated because in one study, less than half of patients were able to list their diagnoses and the names, purpose, and adverse effects of their medications at the time of discharge. Education at the time of discharge and early follow-up also needs to be tailored to patient education level, which has previously been shown to be associated with the risk of readmission among Medicare beneficiaries."

Adrian F. Hernandez, M.D., M.H.S., and Christopher B. Granger, M.D., of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., wrote in an invited commentary accompanying the report:

"In the end, reducing hospital readmission rates by preventing progression of disease and occurrence of events should be a goal of care.

To reduce readmissions, we need better evidence on effective approaches that address our health systems shortcomings, ideally identifying and intervening in the most vulnerable patients. Early outpatient follow-up may be a strategy to reduce readmissions but other interventions will be necessary for this complex, multifaceted problem.

Understanding the common issues between PCI readmissions vs. other medical or surgical conditions will be necessary to have broad-based solutions. The challenge is determining what, if any, of these solutions will reduce readmission and improve overall quality of care during this period of patient vulnerability and fragmented care."

Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.569.

Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi: 10/1001/archinternmed.2011.568.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Transfer To Another Hospital For Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Recommended Guidelines Rarely Met

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Also Included In: Heart Disease
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet rated2 stars
According to an investigation in the Nov. 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, the estimated time for patients in need of transfer to another hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; procedures such as stent placement of balloon angioplasty used to open narrow coronary arteries) seldom meets the recommended guidelines of 30 minutes or less.

The researchers explain:

"Delays in treatment time are commonplace for patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) who must be transferred to another hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention. Experts have recommended that door-in to door-out (DIDO) time (i.e., the time from arrival at the first hospital to transfer from that hospital to the percutaneous coronary intervention hospital) should not exceed 30 minutes."

Jeph Herrin, Ph.D., of Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., and his team, set out to analyze DIDO times for individuals who arrived at an emergency department with STEMI and who required transfer to another hospital for PCI. The team analyzed data on all individuals' hospitals reported with five or more suitable transfer patients between January 1, and December 31, 2009.

According to results from the study, out of the 13,776 individuals from 1,034 hospital included in the examination, 9.7% (1,343) patients DIDO time was within the recommended 30 minutes, while for 4,267 patients (31%) DIDO time exceeded 90 minutes. After the team adjusted for hospital and patient characteristics they found: Women had a mean (average) estimated time 8.9 minutes longer than men African Americans estimated time was 9.1 minutes longer compared to white patients Individuals aged between 18-35 years had an estimated time considerably longer than all patients apart from those over the age of 75, with a time 18.3 minutes longer relative to those aged 46-55 yearsThe researchers conclude:

"Among patients presenting to emergency departments and requiring transfer to another facility for percutaneous coronary intervention, the DIDO time rarely met the recommended 30 minutes. DIDO time may be a key component of treatment delays in patients with STEMI who are transferred for PCI; improvement efforts should focus on understanding and reducing this delay."

Furthermore, in a study published Online First, Eric A. Secemsky, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco, and his team set out to analyze if developing a 24-hour cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) was connected with enhanced transfer times among individuals with STEMI presenting at a public hospital previously reliant on transferring individuals for percutaneous coronary intervention.

The team enrolled patients with a clinical diagnosis of STEMI between April 2005 and October 2008, successful transfer for angiography and available data for all time intervals. They discovered that among transfer patients, median (midpoint) times were 184 minutes for door-to-catheterization (DTC) and 200 minutes for door-to-balloon (DTB), with no patients transferred in under 90 minutes. Among individuals treated after the 24-hour PCI facility was created median times for DTC reduced to 50 minutes, and median times for DTB decreased to 84 minutes, with 65% of individuals transferred in under 90 minutes.

The researchers conclude:

"Creation of a CCL successfully improved median DTB times to less than 90 minutes, and currently, nearly 90 percent of patients with STEMI are revascularized in less than 90 minutes."

In an article published Online First, Archives editor Rita F. Redberg, M.D., M.Sc., of the University of California, San Francisco, states: "Primary PCI [pPCI] is resource intensive and therefore not widely available. Of the nearly 5,000 acute care hospitals in the United States, less than one-fourth have PCI capability and even less can provide 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-per-week (24/7) PCI.

Despite years of hard work and noble efforts by many individuals and professional organizations...to enable hospitals to either provide pPCI or reduce door-in to door-out (DIDO) time in transferring to a facility that does, results have been disappointing. After years of well-intentioned arduous efforts to decrease DIDO time, it is time to consider other strategies.

Dr. Redberg concludes:

"The reports by Herrin et al and Want et al show us that DIDO time remains much slower than benchmarks. For low- and intermediate-risk patients, there is no mortality advantage to pPCI over thrombolytic therapy...It is time to reconsider transferring patients with STEMI for pPCI. Timely reperfusion by thrombolytics, not late pPCI via transfer, will save lives."

Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our cardiovascular / cardiology section for the latest news on this subject. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171[21]:1879-1886; doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.564.

Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.566.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "Transfer To Another Hospital For Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Recommended Guidelines Rarely Met." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

joi, 8 decembrie 2011

9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
According to a study published Online First by the Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, an examination of the outcomes of over 15,000 individuals who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; balloon angioplasty or stent placement procedures to open narrow coronary arteries) revealed that almost 1 in 10 individuals were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Furthermore, these patients also had an increased risk of death within one year. Several factors were connected with hospital readmission, including Medicare insurance, female sex, unstable angina and others.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day readmission rates have become a quality performance measure, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports hospital-level, 30-day, risk-standardized readmission rates for patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; heart attack), and for patients undergoing PCI. However, little is known regarding the factors associated with 30-day readmission after PCI."

Farhan J. Khawaja, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., and colleagues carried out an investigation in order to detect factors connected with 30-day readmission rates as well as the reason for the readmission and the connection of 30-day readmission with one-year mortality rates for individuals after PCI. The team identified 15,498 PCI hospitalizations (elective or for acute coronary syndromes) between January 1998 and June 2008. A range of models were used in order to estimate the adjusted connection between clinical, demographic, and procedural variable as well as 30-day readmission and one-year mortality.

The team found that overall, 9.4% (1,459) patients who had undergone PCI procedures were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Out of the 1,459 patients readmitted 1,003 (69%) were readmission due to cardiac-related reasons. Within 30 days there were 106 deaths (0.68%), including 73 deaths not linked to a readmission and 33 deaths that occurred during or after readmission.

The researchers state:

"After multivariate analysis, demographic factors associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission for PCI included female sex, Medicare insurance, and less than a high school education. The clinical and procedural factors associated with an increased risk of readmission include CHF at presentation, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, moderate to severe renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease, metastatic cancer, and a length of stay of more than three days."

After the researchers adjusted for various factors they discovered that individuals who were readmitted within 30 days had a higher death rate at one year compared to individuals who were not readmitted.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day risk-standardized readmission rates after PCI have become a publicly reported performance measure, and there is high interest from hospitals and clinicians to understand and improve modifiable factors associated with 30-day readmission rates.

Lack of early follow-up has been associated with increased risk of readmission among patients with heart failure and may also be playing a role in patients undergoing PCI. Early follow-up allows patients and clinicians to ensure understanding and compliance, and to gauge the effectiveness of therapies.

The educational component of follow-up cannot be underestimated because in one study, less than half of patients were able to list their diagnoses and the names, purpose, and adverse effects of their medications at the time of discharge. Education at the time of discharge and early follow-up also needs to be tailored to patient education level, which has previously been shown to be associated with the risk of readmission among Medicare beneficiaries."

Adrian F. Hernandez, M.D., M.H.S., and Christopher B. Granger, M.D., of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., wrote in an invited commentary accompanying the report:

"In the end, reducing hospital readmission rates by preventing progression of disease and occurrence of events should be a goal of care.

To reduce readmissions, we need better evidence on effective approaches that address our health systems shortcomings, ideally identifying and intervening in the most vulnerable patients. Early outpatient follow-up may be a strategy to reduce readmissions but other interventions will be necessary for this complex, multifaceted problem.

Understanding the common issues between PCI readmissions vs. other medical or surgical conditions will be necessary to have broad-based solutions. The challenge is determining what, if any, of these solutions will reduce readmission and improve overall quality of care during this period of patient vulnerability and fragmented care."

Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.569.

Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi: 10/1001/archinternmed.2011.568.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
8 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Transfer To Another Hospital For Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Recommended Guidelines Rarely Met

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Also Included In: Heart Disease
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet rated2 stars
According to an investigation in the Nov. 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, the estimated time for patients in need of transfer to another hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; procedures such as stent placement of balloon angioplasty used to open narrow coronary arteries) seldom meets the recommended guidelines of 30 minutes or less.

The researchers explain:

"Delays in treatment time are commonplace for patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) who must be transferred to another hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention. Experts have recommended that door-in to door-out (DIDO) time (i.e., the time from arrival at the first hospital to transfer from that hospital to the percutaneous coronary intervention hospital) should not exceed 30 minutes."

Jeph Herrin, Ph.D., of Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., and his team, set out to analyze DIDO times for individuals who arrived at an emergency department with STEMI and who required transfer to another hospital for PCI. The team analyzed data on all individuals' hospitals reported with five or more suitable transfer patients between January 1, and December 31, 2009.

According to results from the study, out of the 13,776 individuals from 1,034 hospital included in the examination, 9.7% (1,343) patients DIDO time was within the recommended 30 minutes, while for 4,267 patients (31%) DIDO time exceeded 90 minutes. After the team adjusted for hospital and patient characteristics they found: Women had a mean (average) estimated time 8.9 minutes longer than men African Americans estimated time was 9.1 minutes longer compared to white patients Individuals aged between 18-35 years had an estimated time considerably longer than all patients apart from those over the age of 75, with a time 18.3 minutes longer relative to those aged 46-55 yearsThe researchers conclude:

"Among patients presenting to emergency departments and requiring transfer to another facility for percutaneous coronary intervention, the DIDO time rarely met the recommended 30 minutes. DIDO time may be a key component of treatment delays in patients with STEMI who are transferred for PCI; improvement efforts should focus on understanding and reducing this delay."

Furthermore, in a study published Online First, Eric A. Secemsky, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco, and his team set out to analyze if developing a 24-hour cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) was connected with enhanced transfer times among individuals with STEMI presenting at a public hospital previously reliant on transferring individuals for percutaneous coronary intervention.

The team enrolled patients with a clinical diagnosis of STEMI between April 2005 and October 2008, successful transfer for angiography and available data for all time intervals. They discovered that among transfer patients, median (midpoint) times were 184 minutes for door-to-catheterization (DTC) and 200 minutes for door-to-balloon (DTB), with no patients transferred in under 90 minutes. Among individuals treated after the 24-hour PCI facility was created median times for DTC reduced to 50 minutes, and median times for DTB decreased to 84 minutes, with 65% of individuals transferred in under 90 minutes.

The researchers conclude:

"Creation of a CCL successfully improved median DTB times to less than 90 minutes, and currently, nearly 90 percent of patients with STEMI are revascularized in less than 90 minutes."

In an article published Online First, Archives editor Rita F. Redberg, M.D., M.Sc., of the University of California, San Francisco, states: "Primary PCI [pPCI] is resource intensive and therefore not widely available. Of the nearly 5,000 acute care hospitals in the United States, less than one-fourth have PCI capability and even less can provide 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-per-week (24/7) PCI.

Despite years of hard work and noble efforts by many individuals and professional organizations...to enable hospitals to either provide pPCI or reduce door-in to door-out (DIDO) time in transferring to a facility that does, results have been disappointing. After years of well-intentioned arduous efforts to decrease DIDO time, it is time to consider other strategies.

Dr. Redberg concludes:

"The reports by Herrin et al and Want et al show us that DIDO time remains much slower than benchmarks. For low- and intermediate-risk patients, there is no mortality advantage to pPCI over thrombolytic therapy...It is time to reconsider transferring patients with STEMI for pPCI. Timely reperfusion by thrombolytics, not late pPCI via transfer, will save lives."

Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our cardiovascular / cardiology section for the latest news on this subject. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171[21]:1879-1886; doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.564.

Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.566.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "Transfer To Another Hospital For Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Recommended Guidelines Rarely Met." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
8 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here