vineri, 9 decembrie 2011

Improved Technology May Obviate Need For Drug When Assessing Patients For A Coronary Stent

Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 08 Dec 2011 - 2:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
4 and a half starsnot yet rated
Improved diagnostic technology may obviate need for drug when assessing whether a patient needs a coronary stent.

A new method for measuring narrowing in the arteries of the heart may allow patients to be assessed for a stent without having to take a drug with unpleasant side effects.

In England, it is estimated that one in seven men and one in 12 women over the age of 65 experience chest pain called angina caused by narrowing of the arteries in the heart. Around 60,000 such patients a year are fitted with a coronary stent a wire mesh tube that acts as a scaffold to keep open arteries that risk becoming blocked, leading to a heart attack. However, stents sometimes lead to problems later on as they can promote the growth of scar tissue, leading to re-narrowing of the artery. It is therefore important to determine when a stent is needed and when it might not be worth the risk.

The most accurate method currently used to measure narrowing in arteries requires the patient to take a drug such as adenosine that dilates the blood vessels. Now, a refined, investigational drug-free technique may be just as reliable, according to the results of a feasibility study published today in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Doctors traditionally assess narrowing of the coronary arteries using an X-ray image called a coronary angiogram, but it may not always be clear from the angiogram whether a stent is absolutely necessary.

A technique called fractional flow reserve (FFR), which involves inserting a wire into the artery to measure changes in blood pressure, is sometimes used in addition to an angiogram to give a more clinically accurate measurement to help clinicians make the decision to insert a stent. However, FFR requires the patient to be given a drug such as adenosine to dilate blood vessels, which can cause unpleasant side effects including facial flushing and shortness of breath. Although there is good evidence that FFR is useful, it is done in only 5-10 per cent of cardiac stenting procedures because it is costly, time-consuming and some patients cannot receive adenosine, such as patients with certain heart conduction diseases.

Now, researchers at Imperial College London, in collaboration with US-based medical technology company Volcano Corporation (NASDAQ: VOLC), have developed a way to measure narrowings in the arteries instantaneously, using the same instruments as FFR but without the need for a drug. The new investigational method, termed the instant wave-Free Ratio™ (iFR™ ,could benefit patients by making it easier for doctors to determine whether a stent is the best option.

"FFR is a valuable tool that helps doctors make treatment decisions, but certain barriers mean it isn't used as often as it might be," said lead researcher Dr Justin Davies, from the National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College London. "One of those barriers is the need to inject adenosine, which simulates how the heart behaves when the patient is exercising. Having to use adenosine increases the time, cost and complexity of the procedure, not to mention causing some discomfort for the patient. Our new approach could enable doctors to perform an accurate measurement without the use of drugs. We think this will have a big impact on clinical practice."

Like FFR, iFR works by inserting a wire into the coronary artery to measure blood pressure on either side of the narrowing. Dr Davies and his colleagues demonstrated that it was possible to obtain a measurement during a particular time in the heart's cycle, which did not depend on using drugs to dilate the blood vessels.

In the study, the researchers used the new iFR method to measure 157 artery narrowings in 131 patients. They found that iFR produced very similar results to FFR, and that the measurements using iFR were highly reproducible.

This study was funded by the Imperial Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, established by a grant from the National Institute for Health Research; and the Coronary Flow Trust with support from Volcano Corporation. iFR is an investigational method being developed, and upon regulatory approval will be commercialized, by Volcano. Additional research is planned to validate this new methodology.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Source: Imperial College London
Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Imperial College London. "Improved Technology May Obviate Need For Drug When Assessing Patients For A Coronary Stent." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 8 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

NYU Langone Medical Center Launches New LVAD Program For Advanced Heart Failure Patients

Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 02 Dec 2011 - 1:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
The Cardiac & Vascular Institute at NYU Langone Medical Center has established its new LVAD Program. This surgical intervention program offers eligible, advanced heart failure patients implantation of the latest, lifesaving tool a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). NYU Langone offers the only FDA approved LVAD device for advanced heart failure.

"NYU Langone is expanding its heart failure treatments to offer state-of-the art LVAD technology, an important new tool in our arsenal to battle advanced heart failure," said Leora Balsam, MD, surgical director of the LVAD Program and assistant professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery. "Here on the front lines of cardiovascular care at the Medical Center we now have the surgical capabilities to offer a scientifically proven therapy that can dramatically increase the length and quality of life of our patients that need it most. "

Advanced heart failure is the heart's inability to pump enough blood to meet the demands of the body. The condition causes patients to experience severe fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, decreased mobility and extreme build up of fluids in the body leading to hospital admissions, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. There are approximately 200,000 people living with advanced heart failure in the United States but only 2,000 heart transplants available each year. Many advanced heart failure patients are not eligible for transplant due to the presence of other diseases or co-morbidities.

The new LVAD Program is focused on offering LVAD technology to advanced heart failure patients for long-term use (Destination Therapy) to increase life expectancy and quality of life of those patients who are not candidates for a heart transplant. During the past few months, several patients have successfully received LVADs at NYU Langone. The device can also be used for advanced heart failure patients awaiting heart transplant (Bridge-to-Transplant).

LVAD technology helps the patient's heart pump blood continuously through the heart and the rest of the body, improving patient survival. Research studies show LVAD technology can potentially increase patient survival sometimes more than 5 years. It is implanted during a 6-hour open-heart surgery and is placed under the skin of the upper abdomen while two tubes are surgically connected individually to the heart's left ventricle and the aorta. The device pumps blood away from the left ventricle of the heart and to the aorta. The LVAD is powered by an external control system and battery pack worn by the patient.

Candidates for LVAD implantation are those adult patients with life-limiting disease due primarily to advanced heart failure from isolated left ventricular malfunction. The device requires that the right side of the patient's heart be healthy enough to work in harmony with the newly assisted pumping function of the left ventricle. There is no patient age-limit.

"LVAD technology has potentially life-altering benefits for heart failure patients," said Alex Reyentovich, MD, medical director of the LVAD Program in the Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology at NYU Langone. "It is tremendously rewarding to improve and extend the life of patients so they can experience life's milestones. LVAD technology is not only a milestone for our patients but also our multi-disciplinary Heart Failure team."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Source: New York University Langone Medical Center
Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. New York University Langone Medical Center Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

New York University Langone Medical Center. "NYU Langone Medical Center Launches New LVAD Program For Advanced Heart Failure Patients." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 2 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Researchers Examine Role Of Inflammatory Mechanisms In A Healing Heart Opening New Avenues For Prevention And Treatment Of Heart Failure

Key Area Identified That Could Sever Communication Between Brain And Heart In Disease

Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Neurology / Neuroscience;  Cardiovascular / Cardiology;  Hypertension
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 0:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
3 starsnot yet rated
A team of neuroscientists and anaesthetists, who have been using pioneering techniques to study how the brain regulates the heart, has identified a crucial part of the nervous system whose malfunction may account for an increased risk of death from heart failure. The findings, published online (ahead of print) in the Journal of Physiology, could lead to more targeted therapies to help reduce serious illness and death in cardiovascular disease.

The research team, led by Dr Tony Pickering and Professor Julian Paton from the University of Bristol and colleague Professor Robin McAllen from the Florey Neuroscience Institute in Melbourne, developed novel methods which enabled them to explore the activity of nerve cells as they control the beating heart.

The brain controls the heart through two divisions of the nervous system; parasympathetic (vagal) and sympathetic nerves. One of these nerves, the vagus, acts to slow heart rate as part of protective cardiovascular reflexes, which are vital for cardiac health. A loss of vagal control is a major risk factor in human cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure and hypertension.

Vagal information to the heart is transmitted through a special group of nerve cells that remarkably lie on and within the beating heart muscle. Until now, these important neurones have proved especially difficult to access and record in a system with preserved natural connections. However, academics at the Bristol Heart Institute and Bristol Neuroscience have developed a novel technique that allows the neurones to be held stable while the heart is still beating and their central neural connectivity remains intact.

Using this method the researchers were able to produce high-precision recordings from the cardiac ganglion neurones on the surface of the beating heart whilst retaining their inputs from the nervous system.

The results reveal how these neurones process their inputs and demonstrate that the ganglion plays a key role in regulating the level of vagal tone reaching the heart. This identifies the cardiac ganglion as a site at which the vagal transmission may fail and therefore a potential target for interventions to restore vagal control in cardiovascular diseases.

Dr Pickering, Wellcome Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Reader in Neuroscience and Consultant in Anaesthesia in the University of Bristol's School of Physiology and Pharmacology, said: "These findings are important because they clearly show the cardiac ganglion as a key player in determining the level of vagal tone reaching the heart.

"As loss of vagal tone is found in a number of cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, following heart attack, in high blood pressure and diabetes, and is associated with poor prognosis and an increased risk of death, our results indicate that therapies targeted at the cardiac ganglion could restore vagal tone and potentially improve outcomes."

Helene Wilson, Research Advisor at the British Heart Foundation (BHF), said: "The vagus nerves are absolutely vital for the control of the speed and regularity of our heart's beat. We don't know a great deal about how the vagus nerves exert this control, and researchers have found it very hard to study it - partly because of the motion of the heart as it beats. These researchers have now developed a technique to study the processes in an intact vagus nerve which is still attached to heart, and have already helped us understand the process better. New insights into how the vagus nerves transmit their effects on the heart could lead to important new ways to treat patients with diseases such as heart failure, arrhythmias and hypertension."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. The study is a result of an international collaboration between the University of Bristol and academics at the Florey Neuroscience Institute in Melbourne. The work is funded by the British Heart Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in Australia.
University of Bristol Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

University of Bristol. "Key Area Identified That Could Sever Communication Between Brain And Heart In Disease." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Similar Blood Pressure Drugs Could Have Different Impacts On Dialysis Patients' Heart Health

Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 09 Dec 2011 - 2:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
Two seemingly similar blood pressure lowering drugs have different effects on the heart health of dialysis patients, according to a study appearing in an upcoming issue of the Journal of the American Society Nephrology (JASN). The results indicate that certain dialysis patients may benefit more from one drug while some should opt for the other.

About 20% of kidney disease patients die within one year after they start dialysis and more than half die after five years mostly from heart disease. Two classes of drugs, called angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), act in a similar way to prevent and treat heart disease in the general population. Studies of the drugs in dialysis patients are scarce.

ACE inhibitors and ARBs primarily lower blood pressure, but they also decrease inflammation and can produce other beneficial effects for patients. T. Alp Ikizler, MD (Vanderbilt University Medical Center) and his colleagues looked to see if there is a difference between ACE inhibitor and ARB treatments on dialysis patients' heart health.

The researchers randomized 15 dialysis patients to receive an ACE inhibitor, an ARB, or a placebo for one week. Then patients received no treatment for three weeks, after which they were again randomized to receive an ACE inhibitor, an ARB, or a placebo for one week. This wash-out/treatment cycle was then conducted once more. Tests were conducted after each treatment cycle.

The investigators found that ARBs were more effective at fighting inflammation while ACE inhibitors were better at preventing blood vessel damage. Both of these properties could help prevent heart disease. The results suggest that ACE inhibitors and ARBs have different effects on dialysis patients' heart health that go beyond their similar blood pressure lowering capabilities.

"The implication is that the choice of each of the drugs in dialysis patients could depend on the profile of each individual considered for treatment, which would be a more personalized approach to therapy," said Dr. Ikizler. This implies that different dialysis patients might respond to each drug differently and that some would get the most benefit from ACE inhibitors while others would benefit more from ARBs. The findings emphasize the need for a long-term randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of ARBs and ACE inhibitors on different aspects of heart health in dialysis patients.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Source: American Society of Nephrology
Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. American Society of Nephrology Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

American Society of Nephrology. "Similar Blood Pressure Drugs Could Have Different Impacts On Dialysis Patients' Heart Health." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 9 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Mortality Risk In Patients With Chest Pains Increased By Prior Hospitalization For Mental Illness

Main Category: Mental Health
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry;  Heart Disease;  Diabetes
Article Date: 02 Dec 2011 - 1:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet rated5 stars
New research from Scotland has shown that the rate of death in men and women hospitalised for chest pain unrelated to heart disease is higher in those with a history of psychiatric illness than without.

The study published online in Europe's leading cardiology journal, the European Heart Journal [1] found that the death rate one year after hospitalisation for NCCP (non-cardiac chest pain) was higher in men and women with a previous psychiatric hospitalisation than without, with cardiovascular disease accounting for the majority of deaths among men and women with a previous psychiatric hospitalisation.

Dr Michelle Gillies, Clinical Lecturer in Epidemiology, at the University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, said: "We found that men and women with a prior psychiatric hospitalisation were younger, more socioeconomically deprived and more likely to be suffering from diabetes or hypertension than those without a prior psychiatric hospitalisation. Even after adjusting for these differences we found that the rate of death at one year from any cause and from cardiovascular disease was higher in men and women with a previous psychiatric hospitalisation than without, with the excess risk being greatest in younger patients."

Using routinely collected hospital admission data from the Scottish National Health Service the researchers identified over 150,000 men and women, without existing heart disease, hospitalised for the first time for NCCP between 1991 and 2006. Of these, 3514 (4.4%) men and 3136 (3.9%) women had a previous psychiatric hospitalisation in the preceding 10 years. One year after hospital discharge for NCCP, there were more deaths among patients with a previous psychiatric hospitalisation than those without: 6.3% versus 4.3% respectively in men, and 5.3% versus 3.6% in women. Cardiovascular disease was the most frequent cause of death, accounting for 28.2% and 44.1% of all deaths in men and women respectively, who had a previous psychiatric hospitalisation.

Dr Gillies said: "Our findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown that patients with psychiatric illness have a greater risk of heart-related problems and are at a greater risk of death than the general population. In our study patients with psychiatric illness were at excess risk of death relative to the rest of the study population, despite having been assessed by hospital physicians for chest pain. A hospitalisation for chest pain is a valuable opportunity to engage this difficult-to-reach population, assess cardiovascular risk and intervene to reduce risk.

"Our study highlights the need to carefully assess all patients who are admitted to hospital with chest pain and suggests that current approaches to this assessment may be less effective in patients with psychiatric illness. Further studies to understand why this is so, are required. We would urge clinicians to carefully assess cardiovascular risk in all patients with psychiatric illness, a view supported by a recent joint position statement issued by the European Psychiatric Association and European Society of Cardiology," [3], said Dr Gillies.

In an accompanying editorial [2], Bertram Pitt, Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Michigan School of Medicine (Michigan, USA), wrote: "The initial episode of psychiatric hospitalization or possibly the diagnosis of psychiatric illness rather than the first episode of NCCP should be the time to consult a cardiologist, and the stimulus for intensive cardiac evaluation and risk factor control to prevent the development of coronary artery disease and its consequences."

He added: "While the exact mechanisms linking a prior psychiatric hospitalization and a first hospitalization for NCCP to increased cardiovascular and total mortality remain uncertain, we are indebted to Dr Gillies et al. for pointing out the increased cardiovascular risk and the need for cardiovascular evaluation of these patients. The increasing evidence that both vascular disease and psychiatric illnesses such as anxiety and depression share common mechanisms suggests challenges and opportunities for both the psychiatrist and the cardiologist to improve risk detection and to prevent cardiovascular and total mortality in patients with psychiatric illnesses both with and without NCCP. . . . This will, however, require a further understanding of the links between psychiatric illness and cardiovascular disease as well as prospective evaluation."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our mental health section for the latest news on this subject. [1] "Prior psychiatric hospitalization is associated with excess mortality in patients hospitalized with non-cardiac chest pain: a data linkage study based on the full Scottish population (1991)". European Heart Journal. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr401
[2] "Increased cardiovascular risk associated with non-cardiac chest pain in patients with a prior psychiatric hospitalization: an opportunity and challenge for both the psychiatrist and the cardiologist". European Heart Journal. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr390
[3] "Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people with severe mental illness position statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)". European Psychiatry (2009), doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.01.005
European Society of Cardiology Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

European Society of Cardiology. "Mortality Risk In Patients With Chest Pains Increased By Prior Hospitalization For Mental Illness." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 2 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


posted by William Gipson on 4 Dec 2011 at 2:08 am

First Psychariatic Doctors tend to evaluate and sign you off on dosages of medicines which with any other pain management cause you to suffer and most likely place you in and under stress relief but adding to your being tired and sleepy majority of the time Then if it is not to late or you haven`t driven off the road or already had a accident they tell you to exercise and go out walking when your energy level is down and you haven`t completely understood what disease you are under and if or are you over medicated and why so many pills to take. I have been missed prognosed and evaluated to where I was almost dead or died temporary and now I have been told I have a diseased heart. With clearence for knee surery clearance and possible back l3-l4-l5 root damage with impingement at roots with diseased and narrowing of spine synosis etc. Will need evaluation for next alternative I may have, Miniscus tear and tendon tear on left knee. It has been two years with out treatment so why even do any repair because of the age and it has not been to bother some since I have taken Vitamine D 1000 Miligrams a day and small regiment of exercise etc.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 30 Nov 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
According to a study published Online First by the Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, an examination of the outcomes of over 15,000 individuals who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; balloon angioplasty or stent placement procedures to open narrow coronary arteries) revealed that almost 1 in 10 individuals were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Furthermore, these patients also had an increased risk of death within one year. Several factors were connected with hospital readmission, including Medicare insurance, female sex, unstable angina and others.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day readmission rates have become a quality performance measure, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports hospital-level, 30-day, risk-standardized readmission rates for patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; heart attack), and for patients undergoing PCI. However, little is known regarding the factors associated with 30-day readmission after PCI."

Farhan J. Khawaja, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., and colleagues carried out an investigation in order to detect factors connected with 30-day readmission rates as well as the reason for the readmission and the connection of 30-day readmission with one-year mortality rates for individuals after PCI. The team identified 15,498 PCI hospitalizations (elective or for acute coronary syndromes) between January 1998 and June 2008. A range of models were used in order to estimate the adjusted connection between clinical, demographic, and procedural variable as well as 30-day readmission and one-year mortality.

The team found that overall, 9.4% (1,459) patients who had undergone PCI procedures were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Out of the 1,459 patients readmitted 1,003 (69%) were readmission due to cardiac-related reasons. Within 30 days there were 106 deaths (0.68%), including 73 deaths not linked to a readmission and 33 deaths that occurred during or after readmission.

The researchers state:

"After multivariate analysis, demographic factors associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission for PCI included female sex, Medicare insurance, and less than a high school education. The clinical and procedural factors associated with an increased risk of readmission include CHF at presentation, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, moderate to severe renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease, metastatic cancer, and a length of stay of more than three days."

After the researchers adjusted for various factors they discovered that individuals who were readmitted within 30 days had a higher death rate at one year compared to individuals who were not readmitted.

The researchers explain:

"Thirty-day risk-standardized readmission rates after PCI have become a publicly reported performance measure, and there is high interest from hospitals and clinicians to understand and improve modifiable factors associated with 30-day readmission rates.

Lack of early follow-up has been associated with increased risk of readmission among patients with heart failure and may also be playing a role in patients undergoing PCI. Early follow-up allows patients and clinicians to ensure understanding and compliance, and to gauge the effectiveness of therapies.

The educational component of follow-up cannot be underestimated because in one study, less than half of patients were able to list their diagnoses and the names, purpose, and adverse effects of their medications at the time of discharge. Education at the time of discharge and early follow-up also needs to be tailored to patient education level, which has previously been shown to be associated with the risk of readmission among Medicare beneficiaries."

Adrian F. Hernandez, M.D., M.H.S., and Christopher B. Granger, M.D., of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., wrote in an invited commentary accompanying the report:

"In the end, reducing hospital readmission rates by preventing progression of disease and occurrence of events should be a goal of care.

To reduce readmissions, we need better evidence on effective approaches that address our health systems shortcomings, ideally identifying and intervening in the most vulnerable patients. Early outpatient follow-up may be a strategy to reduce readmissions but other interventions will be necessary for this complex, multifaceted problem.

Understanding the common issues between PCI readmissions vs. other medical or surgical conditions will be necessary to have broad-based solutions. The challenge is determining what, if any, of these solutions will reduce readmission and improve overall quality of care during this period of patient vulnerability and fragmented care."

Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our heart disease section for the latest news on this subject. Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.569.

Arch Intern Med. November 28, 2011. doi: 10/1001/archinternmed.2011.568.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "9.4% Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Back In Hospital Within A Month." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Nov. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here